🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are paid to talk to predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has evolved since its inception, giving reduced attention to the histories of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is celebrated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how important it is to rethink Black History Month better than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the warmer months we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a reason for concern. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the America, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A drive to erase the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is in progress. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how little it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the realities of the present. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at an educational institution, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just do away with things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed through the year (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What value has simple recognition of the bygone era when it ignores the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.